Difference between revisions of "Europe"

From FDNAPI Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
== Resources ==
 
== Resources ==
 
*External links
 
*External links
 +
*[European Court of Human Rights: CASE OF GAUGHRAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM. Judgment, Strasbourg (13th February 2020)]
 
**[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2018)604971 Toom V (2018): Cross-Border Exchange and Comparison of Forensic DNA Data in the Context of the Prüm Decision. European Parliament (7th June 2018)]
 
**[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2018)604971 Toom V (2018): Cross-Border Exchange and Comparison of Forensic DNA Data in the Context of the Prüm Decision. European Parliament (7th June 2018)]
 
**[https://dnadatabank.forensischinstituut.nl/binaries/ENFSI%20DOCUMENT%20ON%20DNA-DATABASE%20MANAGEMENT%202017_tcm37-209505.pdf DNA DATABASE MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS.ENFSI DNA Working Group. April 2017]
 
**[https://dnadatabank.forensischinstituut.nl/binaries/ENFSI%20DOCUMENT%20ON%20DNA-DATABASE%20MANAGEMENT%202017_tcm37-209505.pdf DNA DATABASE MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS.ENFSI DNA Working Group. April 2017]

Revision as of 02:18, 17 February 2020

Details on DNA databases in each European country can be found on the country pages. Below are resources covering the whole of Europe, including information about the sharing of DNA database matches within the European Union (which is governed by the Pruem Decisions). The UK has opted out of the agreement. The landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of S. and Marper v. the UK led to the removal of over 1.7 million DNA profiles taken from innocent people and from children and the destruction of 7,753,000 DNA samples in England and Wales.

Resources